Process
·
6 min read
How to Run a Design Critique Without the Drama
A simple structure for feedback that improves the work and keeps the team happy.
Set the frame first
Before showing anything, I state the goal, the constraints, and the type of feedback I want. “Does this flow make sense?” gets better answers than “What do you think?” A clear frame keeps the conversation on the problem instead of on personal taste.
Separate observations from opinions
I ask reviewers to describe what they see before saying what they would change. “The button is easy to miss” is useful; “make it bigger” is a guess at a solution. Observations give the designer room to find the best fix.
Start with what is working, and why.
Ask questions before offering solutions.
Tie every comment to the goal of the design.
End with clear next steps and owners.
Close the loop
After the session I send a short summary of decisions and open questions. It keeps everyone aligned and shows that feedback leads somewhere, which is what makes people want to give it.
Previous article
